Overstatement of non-news and trivialization of good adjectives, like "fascinating."
Why do they act like the Clintons reached right in and ripped out a story against GQ's will? They simply reconsidered the original access when they felt their campaign was being undermined. They didn't take anything that didn't already belong to them. And no one forced GQ to keep their access to Bill open.
So how is this possibly man-bites-dog other than it enflames the He-Man Clinton-Haters Club?
No comments:
Post a Comment