Compromise: Churches can post these signs after the churches pay property taxes.I agree. If they want to compete in the real-world with hard-nosed for-profits, then they should be willing to give something up and play on equal footing. I haven't checked but I would assume that private companies pay sales taxes on their signage, while churches and schools as non-profits don't. If we're talking fairness, then I would like to know what's fair about that?
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Sounds Like a Fair Trade to Me
The best response to the LED bill dispute comes from MJB over at the City Paper's comment board accompanying their story today:
Labels:
Culture,
Neighborhoods,
Taxes,
Zoning
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
More than signage - if a church has a fire and expects the fire department to come, they should pay property taxes. If a church has a crime and expects the police to come, they should pay property taxes. If the church expects members to come for worship down nice city streets, they should pay property taxes.
ReplyDelete